Some people believe that visual images (such as photos and videos) provide enough evidence that a crime was committed. Others think that they are not enough on their own and other evidence is needed.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Introduction:
According to some, photo and video evidence is sufficient proof of a crime. However, others believe this form of evidence is insufficient on its own and requires substantiation. In my view, as images can be useful for some crimes as they can be easily manipulated these days, physical proof such as DNA and fingerprints must be present to determine a person's guilt or innocence.